Appropriate surgical margin for odontogenic myxoma: a review of 12 cases

Publication date: Available online 25 June 2018
Source:Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Author(s): Yukinobu Takahashi, Kae Tanaka, Hideaki Hirai, Eriko Marukawa, Toshiyuki Izumo, Hiroyuki Harada
ObjectiveOdontogenic myxoma (OM) is a rare benign tumor that is frequently nonencapsulated and invades the surrounding bone, resulting in a high risk of recurrence. However, the optimal surgical technique and appropriate surgical margin remains controversial. Here, we report our clinical investigation of 12 patients with OM diagnosed histopathologically.Study DesignWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 12 patients treated at our institution. Osteotomy or bone shaving with enucleation was generally performed with 5-mm bony margins from the radiologic extent of the tumor.ResultsOne half of the cases occurred in the maxilla and the other half in the mandible. Treatment for maxillary OM was enucleation in 2 patients and maxillectomy in 4 patients. Treatment for mandibular OM was enucleation with shaving of the surrounding bone in 1 patient and segmental mandibulectomy in 5 patients. Radiographs of surgical specimen removed by segmental mandibulectomy indicated that the mean distance between the tumor and the margin was 5.4 (range 3.4–7.0) mm. Tumor recurrence was noted in 1 patient who had undergone enucleation alone.ConclusionThe 1-cm surgical margin for OM, as reported conventionally, might not be necessary. A prospective study is needed to determine the appropriate surgical margin for OM.



https://ift.tt/2lCS60B