Do Professionals Who Use the Voice in a Journalistic Context Benefit from Humming as a Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Exercise?

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Do Professionals Who Use the Voice in a Journalistic Context Benefit from Humming as a Semi-occluded Vocal Tract Exercise? Via Journal of Voice Many vocal enhancement and rehabilitation programs for voice professionals define vocal exercises without analyzing their effects on that specific population in which they will be applied, in the established dose and often without considering the presence and absence of vocal alteration. Journalists have sought the voice clinic due to new professional vocal demands and a vocal program is being elaborated. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

A Comprehensive Outcome Framework of a Cochlear Implant Program at a University Hospital in Chennai: A Preliminary Report

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader A Comprehensive Outcome Framework of a Cochlear Implant Program at a University Hospital in Chennai: A Preliminary Report Via Otolaryngology Indian Abstract The primary goal of the study was to assess the progress achieved across different implant age groups (0–2 years, 2.1–4 years and 4.1–6 years) using a comprehensive test battery approach targeting areas such as Audition, Speech Perception, Speech Intelligibility and Speech-Language.This cross-sectional study evaluated the outcomes of 40 children who underwent cochlear implantation at Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Chennai. A battery of tests included aided audiogram, Categorical Auditory Performance, Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale; Picture speech identification test in Tamil; Speech Intelligibility Rating Scale and Communication Developmental Eclectic Approach to Language Learning (COMDEALL) were administered to evaluate their auditory, speech perception, speech intelligibility and speech and language skills, respectively. The results of the study suggested that children implanted between 0 and 2 years of age demonstrated better performance in all tasks including audition, speech perception and intelligibility as well as speech and language when compared to the other two older groups. Children implanted between 0 and 2 years reached target milestones early in life similar to their hearing peers. However, children between (2.1– 4 years) also performed well and results indicated that they could catch up with intensive training. The present study reestablished the findings that early implantation (0–2 years) facilitates optimal progress when compared to implantation at later ages within the age range of 0–6 years. It also facilitates parent counseling regarding the realistic expectations with reference to different ages of implantation View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Examination of the Relation Between Audiometric Configuration and Hematological Parameters in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader Examination of the Relation Between Audiometric Configuration and Hematological Parameters in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Via Otolaryngology Indian Abstract Among the hematological parameters, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/ lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been associated with inflammatory state, microvascular damage and ischemia. It is well-known that these ratios increase in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). In ISSHL, different audiographic features may reflect different disease mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate whether there were differences in NLR and PLR among patient groups with different audiometric configurations. Patients meeting the study inclusion criteria were divided into four groups according to their audiogram configurations. Mean NLR and PLR values of the patient groups were compared among themselves and versus control group. The study was conducted with 166 participants. Mean NLR values were 3.07 ± 2.48, 3.30 ± 2.70, 5.24 ± 3.71, 3.57 ± 3.19 and 1.51 ± 0.68 for ascending, flat, descending and total/subtotal audiometric configuration g roups and control group, respectively. Mean PLR values were 145.2 ± 126.7, 130.9 ± 57.8, 192.2 ± 94.4, 143.7 ± 70.8 and 94.1 ± 24.7 for ascending, flat, descending, total/subtotal audiometric configuration groups and control group, respectively. Both NLR and PLR were significantly greater in patients from all configuration groups than in control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the group with descending audiometric configuration showed significantly higher mean NLR and PLR compared to other audiometric configuration groups (p < 0.05). The highest level of inflammation was detected in the ISSHL patient group with high frequency hearing loss and descending audiographic configuration. View on the web Inoreader. Take back control of your news feed. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.