Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5
Άγιος Νικόλαος Κρήτη 72100
2841026182
6032607174

Τετάρτη 4 Ιανουαρίου 2023

Effectiveness and pharmacokinetic exposures of first-line drugs used to treat drug-susceptible tuberculosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Background
Optimal doses of first line drugs for drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) treatment in children and young adolescents remain uncertain. We aimed to determine if children treated using WHO-recommended or higher doses of first-line drugs achieve successful outcomes and sufficient pharmacokinetic exposures.
Methods
Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registries from 2010 to 2021. We included studies in children <18 years, being treated for DS-TB with rifampicin, pyrazinamide, isoniazid, and ethambutol. Outcomes were treatment success rates and drug exposures. The protocol for the systematic review was preregistered in PROSPERO, CRD42021274222.
Results
Of 304 studies identified, 46 studies were eligible for full-text review and 12 and 18 articles were included for the efficacy and pharmacokinetic analysis, respectively. Of 1,830 children in cluded in the efficacy analysis, 82% had favourable outcomes (range 25%-95%). At WHO-recommended doses, exposures to rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were lower in children as compared to adults. Children ≤6 years have 35% lower AUC than older children (14.4 (9.9-18.8) vs 22.0 (13.8-30.1) μg.h/mL) and children with HIV (CWHIV) had 35% lower rifampicin AUC than HIV negative children (17.3 (11.4-23.2) vs 26.5 (21.3-31.7) μg.h/mL). Heterogeneity and small sample sizes were major limitations.
Conclusion
There is large variability in outcomes with an average 82% favourable outcomes. Drug exposures are lower in children than in adults. Younger children and CWHIV are underexposed to rifampicin. Standardization of pharmacokinetic paediatric studies and individual patient data analysis with safety assessment are needed to inform optimal dosing.
View on Web

Are psychedelics the answer to chronic pain: a review of current literature

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Chronic pain is a common and complex problem, with an unknown etiology. Psychedelics like lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin, may play a role in the management of chronic pain. Through activation of the serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor, several neurophysiological responses result in the disruption of functional connections in brain regions associated with chronic pain. Healthy reconnections can be made through neuroplastic effects, resulting in sustained pain relief. However, this process is not fully understood and evidence of efficacy is limited and of low quality. In cancer and palliative related pain, the analgesic potential of psychedelics was established decades ago, and the current literature shows promising results on efficacy and safety in patients with cancer-related psychological distress. In other areas, patients suffering from severe headache disorders like migraine and cluster headache who have self-medicated with psychedelics report both acute and prophylactic efficacy of LSD and psilocybin. Randomized control trials are now being conducted to study the effects in cluster headache Furthermore, psychedelics have a generally favorable safety profile especially when compared to other analgesics like opioids. In addition, psychedelics do not have the addictive potential of opioids. Given the current epidemic use of opioids, and that patients are in desperate need of an alternative treatment, it is important that further research is conducted on the efficacy of psychedelics in chronic pain conditions.

View on Web

Integrative systems immunology uncovers molecular networks of the cell cycle that stratify COVID‐19 severity

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Several perturbations in the number of peripheral blood leukocytes, such as neutrophilia and lymphopenia associated with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, point to systemic molecular cell cycle alterations during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, the landscape of cell cycle alterations in COVID-19 remains primarily unexplored. Here, we performed an integrative systems immunology analysis of publicly available proteome and transcriptome data to characterize global changes in the cell cycle signature of COVID-19 patients. We found significantly enriched cell cycle-associated gene co-expression modules and an interconnected network of cell cycle-associated differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and genes (DEGs) by integrating the molecular data of 1,469 individuals (981 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and 488 controls [either healthy controls or individuals with other respiratory illnesses]). Among these DEPs and DEGs are seve ral cyclins (CCNs), cell division cycles (CDCs), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and mini-chromosome maintenance (MCMs) proteins. COVID-19 patients partially shared the expression pattern of some cell cycle-associated genes with other respiratory illnesses but exhibited some specific differential features. Notably, the cell cycle signature predominated in the patients' blood leukocytes (B, T, and NK cells) and was associated with COVID-19 severity and disease trajectories. These results provide a unique global understanding of distinct alterations in cell cycle-associated molecules in COVID-19 patients, suggesting new putative pathways for therapeutic intervention.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web