Tooth-Borne Anterior Maxillary Distraction for Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia: Our Experience With 147 Patients

Publication date: December 2016
Source:Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volume 74, Issue 12
Author(s): Sunil Richardson, Dhivakar Selvaraj, Rakshit V. Khandeparker, Nikkie S. Seelan, Shweta Richardson
PurposeTo evaluate the results of anterior maxillary distraction for its efficacy and long-term stability in the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia in a large series of patients with a long-term follow-up extending to 4 years.Materials and MethodsOne hundred sixty-four patients at least 10 years old with cleft maxillary hypoplasia who presented to the authors' unit from January 2009 through October 2014 were evaluated retrospectively, irrespective of gender, type of cleft lip and palate, and amount of advancement needed. Anterior maxillary distraction using a tooth-borne distractor appliance was carried out in all patients and all patients were followed up to 4 years (range, 1 to 4 yr) to evaluate the stability of the procedure and to document any relapse using digitalized lateral cephalograms taken before distraction, immediately after distraction (T2), and at the last follow-up visit (T3; range, 1 to 4 yr). Seventeen patients were subsequently lost to follow-up; therefore, a complete set of records was available for 147 patients. In a subset of 50 patients, perceptual speech assessment was carried out preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively by 2 speech pathologists using the Perkins scoring system that allowed the evaluation of 5 parameters (velopharyngeal insufficiency, resonance, nasal air emission, articulation, and intelligibility). None of these patients underwent speech therapy during the course of evaluation. The development of complications intra- or postoperatively was noted. The data were tabulated and analyzed.ResultsAn advancement ranging from 4.0 to 13.1 mm (mean, 9.42 mm) was achieved in all patients. One hundred forty patients (95.23%) showed stable results on lateral cephalograms and when T2 values were compared with T3 values. Seven patients (4.76%) exhibited skeletal relapse in various linear and angular measurements assessed on lateral cephalograms. At 6-month follow-up, improvements of 62% (n = 31), 64% (n = 32), 50% (n = 25), 68% (n = 34), and 70% (n = 35) in velopharyngeal insufficiency, resonance, nasal air emission, articulation, and intelligibility, respectively, were observed, with worsening of all parameters in 1 patient (2%). An overall complication rate of 25.17% (n = 37) was noted, with bleeding being the most common intra- and postoperative complication noted in 15 patients (10.2%). No serious consequences related to any complication were noted.ConclusionAnterior maxillary distraction can be considered a suitable treatment option for the management of mild to moderate cleft maxillary hypoplasia because the anteroposterior deficiency can be addressed at a young age, immediately after the eruption of the maxillary second premolars. Stable long-term results with negligible skeletal relapse are possible with this technique, with an added advantage of unhampered or even improved velopharyngeal function.



http://ift.tt/2fqRyKX