DOES fixation METHOD EFFECTS temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?

Publication date: Available online 7 April 2018
Source:Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Author(s): Erdogan Utku Ureturk, Aysegul Apaydin
PurposeSagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a standard procedure in which miniplates and screws are used to achieve stabilization. Although the titanium plate and screw fixation system is stable, resorbable fixation systems are also used. There is currently no consensus on the ideal fixation technique for SSRO procedures and its effect on the condyle. We aimed to evaluate the stress distribution on temporomandibular joints (TMJ).MethodsA 3D finite element model of a hemimandible was designed and 5 mm advancement was simulated on a computer model. Four different fixation techniques were applied: inverted-L shaped bicortical screws, L-shaped bicortical screws, miniplate with monocortical screws, and miniplate with monocortical screws and bicortical screw. Computer models were prepared twice for resorbable and titanium material. Load of 600N and muscle forces were applied. In the finite element analysis, computer models simulated and analyzed stress distribution of bone, fixation materials and condyle.ResultsBicortical screws increase the total stress on TMJ, and the stress is located more on the posterior part than the anterior. Miniplates decrease the stress, and the forces are located more on the anterior aspect of the TMJ.ConclusionAccording to our analysis, the use of bicortical screws increases the stress amount on the condyle. For the patients with a tendency toward temporomandibular disorders, using miniplate fixation techniques may decrease the forces around the condyle. These findings should be useful for oral surgeons when deciding on the most appropriate fixation technique in patients with a tendency toward temporomandibular joint disorders.



https://ift.tt/2H2Cxfj