Effect of Obesity or Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes on Osseointegration of Dental Implants in a Miniature Swine Model: A Pilot Study

Publication date: August 2018

Source: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volume 76, Issue 8

Author(s): Paulo G. Coelho, Benjamin Pippenger, Nick Tovar, Sietse-Jan Koopmans, Natalie M. Plana, Dana T. Graves, Steve Engebretson, Heleen M.M. van Beusekom, Paula G.F.P. Oliveira, Michel Dard

Purpose

The increasing prevalence of obesity or metabolic syndrome (O/MS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) remains a global health concern. Clinically relevant and practical translational models mimicking human characteristics of these conditions are lacking. This study aimed to demonstrate proof of concept of the induction of stable O/MS and type 2 DM in a Göttingen minipig model and validate both of these disease-adjusted Göttingen minipig models as impaired healing models for the testing of dental implants.

Materials and Methods

Nine minipigs were split into 3 groups—control (normal diet), obese (cafeteria diet), and diabetic (cafeteria diet plus low-dosage streptozotocin)—followed by placement of dental implants. Inflammatory markers including tumor necrosis factor α, C-reactive protein, and cortisol were recorded for each study group. Removal torque was measured, and histomorphometric analysis (bone-to-implant contact and bone area fraction occupancy) was performed.

Results

O/MS pigs showed, on average, a 2-fold increase in plasma C-reactive protein (P < .05) and cortisol (P < .09) concentrations compared with controls; DM pigs showed, on average approximately, a 40-fold increase in plasma tumor necrosis factor α levels (P < .05) and a 2-fold increase in cortisol concentrations (P < .05) compared with controls. The impact of O/MS and DM on implants was determined. The torque to interface failure was highest in the control group (200 N-cm) and significantly lower in the O/MS (90 N-cm) and DM (60 N-cm) groups (P < .01). Bone formation around implants was significantly greater in the control group than in the O/MS and DM groups (P < .02).

Conclusions

Both O/MS and DM minipigs express a human-like disease phenotype, and both presented bone-healing impairment around dental implants. Our finding of no significant difference between type 2 DM and O/MS in bone formation around implants provides evidence that further investigation of the impact of O/MS is warranted.

https://ift.tt/2AaXv9u