Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Αλέξανδρος Γ. Σφακιανάκης
ΩτοΡινοΛαρυγγολόγος
Αναπαύσεως 5
Άγιος Νικόλαος Κρήτη 72100
2841026182
6032607174

Παρασκευή 31 Μαρτίου 2017

Impact of fraction size on locally advanced oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal cancers treated with chemoradiation

S13688375.gif

Publication date: May 2017
Source:Oral Oncology, Volume 68
Author(s): Michael T. Spiotto, Matthew Koshy
ObjectivesAlthough chemoradiation regimens have used various fraction sizes, it remains unclear how differences in fraction size impact outcomes.Materials and methodsUsing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with nasopharynx or oropharynx cancers treated between 2004 and 2012 with chemoradiation using fraction sizes of 1.8Gy (n=1612), 2Gy (n=8092) or 2.12Gy (n=1660). Comparisons between fraction sizes were made in the entire cohort and in a propensity matched cohort.ResultsMedian follow-up was 38.1m. Patients receiving 2.12Gy per fraction were more likely to be treated from 2007 to 2012, to be treated at an academic center, to have T3-T4 tumors and to have oropharyngeal primaries. The 3year overall survival for patients treated with 1.8Gy, 2Gy and 2.12Gy fraction sizes was 72.9%, 77.8% and 83.3%, respectively (P<0.0001). 2.12Gy fraction size was associated with improved survival in patients with nasopharynx cancer (P=0.03), base of tongue cancer (P<0.0001) and tonsil cancer (P=0.0002). On multivariate analysis, improved survival was associated with 2.12Gy fraction sizes compared to 2Gy (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09–1.40, P=0.001) or 1.8Gy (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17–1.58; P<0.0001) fractions sizes.ConclusionChemoradiation regimens using 2.12Gy fraction sizes likely have a potential advantage in select nasopharynx and oropharynx cancer patients based on age, treatment facility and radiotherapy technique. However, it remains unclear if this survival advantage reflected improved disease control due to lack of locoregional control data.



http://ift.tt/2nGfTyF

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου