Efficacy of photodynamic therapy combined with topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a meta‐analysis

Abstract

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a highly effective treatment option for patients with actinic keratoses (AK). However, efficacy can be reduced by insufficient illumination or hyperkeratotic nature of lesions.

Objectives

To investigate if PDT combined with a topical intervention is superior to monotherapy in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

Methods

A systematic literature research was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL. Pertinent trial registers were hand‐searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 20 August 2018. Results were pooled using a random‐effects model to calculate relative risks (RR) or mean differences. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of evidence was estimated for each outcome of interest according to GRADE.

Results

Out of 1,800 references initially identified, 10 RCTs with a total sample size of n=277 were included. Four studies investigated a combination of PDT with imiquimod cream, three with 5‐fluorouracil cream, and one each with ingenol mebutate gel, tazarotene gel, and calcipotriol ointment, respectively. Patients treated with a combination showed higher participant complete (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.15‐2.33; p=0.007) and partial clearance rates (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.84‐1.67; p=0.33). Similarly, the lesion‐specific clearance was higher for PDT plus topical intervention compared to monotherapy (RR 1.48; 95% CI 1.04‐2.11; p=0.03). A subgroup analysis was performed for PDT combined with imiquimod, revealing an increased participant complete clearance rate compared to monotherapy (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09‐2.25, p=0.02). PDT‐induced pain and local skin reactions after treatment were poorly reported. The studies were estimated at high risk for performance and detection bias.

Conclusion

The combination of PDT with another topical drug intervention does improve AK clearance rates compared to either monotherapy alone. This study highlights that the sequential application of two field‐directed treatments represents an efficient approach in patients with multiple AK and field cancerization.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

http://bit.ly/2HOKXZ9